During the American period, there was
this program known as the Homestead Act. This was patterned after the
same program wherein Americans went west and founded their own farms and
homesteads. Now, American agriculture is a Titan in their economy.
Further along there was the Land Reform initiated by President Diosdado
Macapagal and of course, when Martial Law was declared in September 21,
1972, President Ferdinand Marcos declared the entire country a “Land
Reform Zone”. During the reinstallation of Congress in 1988, the
Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) was enacted into law and
then CARPer during the GMA administration.
One question begs to be answered.
How come the great majority of rural Filipinos remain poor? Why have
these laws and programs failed dismally inspite of all the good
intentions that was behind them? It is evident that no matter how noble
the intention of giving land to the landless, there was no support
mechanism in place for the Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries (ARBs). This
has also indirectly contributed to decreasing productivity in land
reform areas. But the real tragedy is that the ARBs became poorer and
more vulnerable to the vicissitudes of fate and economic dynamics.
Maybe
it is time that we look hard into this supposed economic “cure all”,
whether it is a case of twisted economic idealism or twisted economic
romanticism. As quoted : “It was a political solution to an economic
problem”, now we find ourselves in this situation and it is not bound to
get better if the system is not revised. It has been a generation since
CARP was enacted into law. Let us try to save another generation from
lives of hardship and misery.
I was prompted to put forth the
lines above because of a 2007 account I read in the blog of deceased but
well respected journalist Ding Gagelonia. The account went this way:
The True Picture of CARP in Negros Occidental
We had just had a most unusual lunch
experience. I sat across a group of people known as ARB’s – Agrarian
Reform Beneficiaries. These are families who were once farm laborers in
large haciendas but, thanks to the government’s Comprehensive Agrarian
Reform Program (CARP), are now proud owners of the land they once tilled
on behalf of their landlords. Over fried chicken, rice and a hot fudge
sundae, I listened to the people sharing the meal with me. They told us
of their struggles, of the hardships they have all endured, both before
and after they became beneficiaries of CARP.
I have a lump in my throat the whole
time I am writing this piece as I struggle with my own feelings. I am
not a prolific writer. I write only when I feel the urge. Right now I am
writing because I feel compelled to write.
I had seen the headlines only weeks ago
and read about the bloodshed in their lands. We are in the famed island
of Negros, where, in places like Hacienda Velez-Malaga, so many lives
have been wasted in the name of Agrarian Reform. I saw the special
report in one of ABS-CBN’s late night documentary-type shows. I had
prepared myself for an emotional moment. But I didn’t prepare myself for
a guilt trip.
Yes, lunch was one big guilt trip. I
kept asking myself, How can I stand this? Here I am, 3G cellphone in
hand and staying at a luxury hotel, how can I live with myself, with my
30 pounds of excess weight from, well, overeating… how can I face this
other creature of God in front of me and not feel guilty? At sixteen,
she is barely four feet tall. No, she is not a natural dwarf, and she
doesn’t look like those Ethiopian malnourished children from war-torn
Africa that we used to see on the internet. But malnourished she is,
nonetheless, hence the stunted growth. She stopped growing when at age 7
she started working in the sugarcane fields. She’s been out of school
since grade four, and while she dreams of becoming a teacher someday,
she knows that every year that passes, that dream becomes more and more
unlikely to happen, because she has been out of school for six years
now.
Working under the hot sun from sun-up to
sundown, her skin is as dark as the purplish sugarcane in the fields
that she tends. Because her body has been strained by hard labor, she is
not skin and bones. Instead she is muscular like a farm-hand young boy.
Indeed, if not for the name, she could be mistaken for a boy.
She had a good meal today, probably the
only one like it in weeks, if not months. Yet she could not muster a
smile for my camera. The other people in her group confirmed what I had
seen on TV. That indeed there are people in their neighborhood who
gather certain types of stones from a river and boil them to extract
their “flavor” so that they could have some soup. They said it’s not
always that bad. On good days they get to catch some frogs. So I noticed
they purposely did not finish the two pieces of chicken in front of
them. They ate one and they had the other one wrapped to be brought
home. God knows how many more mouths those will feed tonight.
Edelyn hardly speaks. She will only
respond when asked directly, and her answers are typically only a few
words. And tears well in her eyes as she struggles to answer my
questions. So the older women do the talking. And tell her story for
her. I asked her if indeed she knew how to dress and broil a frog, as
claimed by one of the older women. She nods, and for a fleeting moment I
thought I sensed a faint smile – borne maybe out of pride in her shall
we say, unusual culinary skills. In their village, about five kilometers
from the town of Murcia, they have no electricity. Officially, all the
barangays in their town have electricity, but their village is too far
away from the nearest cables. And they have no water. They walk two
kilometers to the nearest water source, a natural spring, for every drop
of water that they use – for drinking, for washing, for cooking, for
bathing, for everything.
I also met Sison Ventoso, a 14-year old
boy named after Jose Maria Sison, founder of the Communist Party of the
Philippines. That name says a lot about who his parents look up to as a
hero. He can easily get mistaken for an 8-year old. He is that small. In
spite of his equally stunted growth, he dreams loftier dreams – of
becoming an engineer. Perhaps that’s because he got as far as grade 6,
two grades higher than Edelyn.
The typical ARB received anywhere from
one-half to two hectares of land acquired by the government from the
previous landowner. The government pays back the former landlords little
by little over a ten-year period. The land is awarded to the tenants on
the belief that as the new landowners, the former landless farmers
become empowered and will no longer need to revolt against the
government to remove the shackles of poverty from their heels. Land
Reform was the perceived cure for poverty, which was the root of all
insurgency in the past: the peasants felt they were not getting a fair
share of the country’s wealth and natural resources. Poverty provided
the fertile ground for the sowing of communist ideals. This is best
exemplified by the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, and has been reprised
many times in other parts of the world.
Indeed land reform, now known as the
comprehensive agrarian reform program, was seen as the cure for poverty,
the root of all economic evils in our country. The simple facts are:
the vast majority of our country is rural, and the livelihood of our
people is mainly agriculture-based. So the thinking goes, for as long as
most Filipinos remain poor peasants, or tenant farmers, we can never
rise from our third-world poverty-beset situation. That is the
socio-eco-political basis for land reform. In the words of Mayor Sonny
Coscolluela of Murcia, it was a political solution to an economic
problem.
The CARP law expires next year, after a
second ten-year extension. Before that, land reform was a landmark
program of former president Diosdado Macapagal, father of President
Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. And after all those years of land reform, where
are we now? Or more significantly, where are the people – by that I
mean the Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries (ARB’s)?
Well I met some of them today. And it
saddens me to acknowledge that they are in fact worse off now,
especially when compared to their counterparts who have remained working
as farm laborers in the big haciendas. While the ARB families are
starving, their counterpart families in the big plantations have a good
life. Their landlords provide for all, repeat, ALL their needs. They
have food on the table, and in the ref (yes, they have refs!), they have
fairly nice clothes, they have medical care, they have social security,
their children go to schools right inside the hacienda. The older kids
even go to college. And I only today did I discover the big difference:
farm workers in the haciendas were salaried employees. As such they had
regular wages, and all the benefits that employees normally get,
including SSS membership.
Sugar plantations are actually
agro-industrial complexes, managed like regular corporations, with the
farm workers providing the bulk of the labor force required for
production. It’s a long process that involves prepping the land prior to
the planting season, all through the growing stage, down to the
harvest, collecting the canes and transporting them to the sugar mill;
from there it goes through a second stage of production until the final
product is produced; and from there it goes to the marketing, sales and
distribution process before all the hard work pays off and the farm gets
cash for its products. And sugar is a once-a-year crop. That means all
throughout the year, the landlord advances all the costs and expenses,
and only at the end of the long process does he get his money back.
When the land gets covered by CARP, the
farm workers effectively lose their jobs. The government takes the land
away from the landowner and gives it to the farmers. So the former
landlords stop paying any wages or any other benefits to them. They
become entrepreneurs even if they do not know the meaning of the term.
Given this background, it is no surprise that most of them fail at it.
But there is more to this than meets the
eye. In spite of their plight, the ARB’s still believe in CARP (and
surprisingly, so do the landlords), if only because they like having
land that they can pawn. The biggest mistake we have made is believing
that giving the land to the farmers solves all our problems. The
Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR), in fact bases the success of its
program on the quantity of land that it has redistributed. With 20-20
hindsight vision, we now know that if that alone is what gets done, then
we are so very badly mistaken in our notion that land redistribution is
all that needs to be done.
The failure of CARP lies in the lack, or
even total absence, of the support services to enable ARB’s to properly
till their land and become economically progressive farmer families.
What typically happens is that after ARB’s receive their land (and
nothing else), they will need to borrow extensively just to get things
started – buy seeds, farm implements, fertilizer, etc. (on top of their
basic needs: food, clothing, shelter). In as short a time as two years,
the ARB family will end up having buried itself into so much debt that
the land they were given eventually gets sold or pawned, surreptitiously
of course, because it is illegal to do so. How that happens is another
story altogether.
In the end, the family ends up so much
worse off than before they were given their land. They still till the
same land but now they have no more landlords to run to for help. In the
past, whatever they needed, whatever emergency befell them, they were
always taken care of by the landlord. Under their new situation, who do
they turn to? One common answer: loan sharks. We already know where that
path leads.
Going back to our lunch guests, in spite
of their seeming lack of education, the ARB’s were quite aware of their
plight. They knew all along how futile the whole exercise was. They
explained for example, how it was impossible for them to pay off their
loans knowing how low their farm’s output would be compared to their
needs. In some cases they only generate an income of a mere P5,000 a
year. Even if they pull out from school all their young children and
commit them to work the fields (not uncommon), it would still not be
enough to feed the family. That’s because most of their income is eaten
up by usurious rates charged by loan sharks.
So they are forced to explore other
income sources. They grow whatever they can grow in the little land that
they have, but since this is too small, they send their children to the
big cities to work as domestic helpers. One mother sent her 14-year old
daughter to Manila. More than ten year later she has yet to hear from
her again. And in spite of the terrible agony she suffers from not
knowing whether her oldest daughter is alive or not, she has sent two
more daughters to Manila, not because they needed to look for their
elder sister, but to look for work. If you noticed that the parents
think of their children as a “labor force,” you are right. Peasant
farmers bear as many children as possible because indeed the children
are “assets” – not much different from their carabaos. More children
means more farm hands to till the land. Child labor is the norm, not the
exception.
In cases where their land is already
effectively controlled by their creditors, the ARB’s end up working the
land like they were tenant farmers all over again. If they can find work
in other farms, such as cutting the grass in preparation for the
planting season, they get paid P80 a day. That’s on the high side. The
not-so-well off landowners can only afford to pay P60 a day. I cannot
imagine how a family can live on P60 a day. It doesn’t help my
imagination to learn that the average family here has 8 children.
The failure that is CARP, or should I
say, the tragedy that is CARP, creates more problems the more we
continue its misguided implementation. Because the old landowners no
longer own the land, they have stopped paying taxes on it. And given
their already sorry state of financial affairs, nobody can expect the
new landowners to pay real estate taxes either. So municipal coffers are
now slowly seeing a continuing decline in tax collections. And with
over-all productivity going down because of this, economic growth in the
rural areas gets as stunted as the growth (or lack of it) of the
malnourished children that are born to the families there. Dwindling
economic activity in major agricultural areas is of course a vicious
cycle that brings down the rest of the country. Not to mention the
impact on overall literacy as more and more of the ARB’s children drop
out of school to either work the fields, or find jobs as domestic
helpers in the bigger cities. In some cases, they go into prostitution.
What’s the bottom line? Why am I so
engrossed in this unpleasant subject matter? Why do I think this
deserves the attention I am asking everyone to give it? Because this
affects all of us. How? Let us not forget, CARP is funded with billions
and billions of tax money – our money. And if my tax money is being used
to create more Edelyn Pinedas, then I feel compelled to put a stop to
it.
https://midfield.wordpress.com/2007/11/16/the-tragedy-that-is-carp/
Post a Comment